Menu

USC scientists surmount big obstacle to reprogram cells

USC scientists have found a solution to untangle twisty DNA, removing kinks so the molecules can be used to reprogram cells to advance regenerative medicine to treat disease. (Illustration/iStock)
USC scientists have found a solution to untangle twisty DNA, removing kinks so the molecules can be used to reprogram cells to advance regenerative medicine to treat disease. (Illustration/iStock)

USC scientists have surmounted a big roadblock in regenerative medicine that has so far constrained the ability to use repurposed cells to treat diseases.

The researchers figured out how to reprogram cells to switch their identity much more reliably than present capabilities. The technique uses enzymes to untangle reprogramming DNA somewhat similar to how a coiffeur conditions tangled hair. The technique works with near-perfect efficiency – in animals and humans – for all types of cells tested in the laboratories of USC’s stem cell research center.

The findings are significant because they clear an obstacle to help scientists find treatments for a wide range of diseases, especially neurologic impairments and conditions such as hearing loss.

“This is a strategy for greatly improving our ability to perform cellular reprogramming, which could enable the regeneration of lost tissues and the study of diseases that cannot be biopsied from living patients today,” said Justin Ichida, Richard N. Merkin, M.D., Assistant Professor of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC.

The findings appear today in Cell Stem Cell. The research paper is titled, “Mitigating antagonism between transcription and proliferation allows near-deterministic cellular reprogramming.” Ichida is the lead author joined by a team of researchers at the Keck School of Medicine.

Cellular reprogramming has enormous potential as a disease cure because it enables scientists to study cells and molecular processes at each step of disease progression in controlled conditions that so far has been impossible.

Reprogramming involves changing one cell into another type of cell, for example a blood cell into a muscle cell or nerve cell. That’s important for medical research because the technique can be used to recreate tissues lost to disease and to study diseases in tissues that cannot be biopsied from living patients.

The technique has been known for decades, but hasn’t met its potential. The USC team discovered that’s because DNA does not respond well when manipulated to change itself. DNA molecules are twisty by nature, due to the double helix configuration. Reprogramming DNA requires uncoiling, yet when scientists begin to unravel the molecules, they knot up tighter. As a result, nucleotides become much more difficult to work with and cells won’t replicate properly, Ichida explained. Current untangling techniques only work 1% of the time.

“Think of it as a phone cord, which is coily to begin with, then gets more coils and knots when something is trying to harm it,” Ichida said.

To smooth the kinks, the researchers treated cells with a chemical and genetic cocktail that activated enzymes called topoisomerases. The process works by using the enzymes to open the DNA molecules, release the coiled tension, and lay it smoothly. In turn, that leads to more efficient cellular reprogramming, which increases the number of cells capable of simultaneous transcription and proliferation, which is needed to promote tissue growth. It’s the equivalent of a DNA detangler to relax the tension of reprogramming transcription and make it easier to replicate new cell colonies or tissues in a lab.

The technique has multiple advantages over existing current practice. For example, it worked nearly 100% of the time. It was proven in human and mouse cells. It can be employed today in laboratories to study disease development and drug treatments. It has immediate utility for studying schizophrenia, Parkinson’s, ALS and other neurological diseases; in those instances, new cells can be created to replace lost cells or acquire cells that can’t be extracted from people.

Moreover, the technique does not involve stem cells, so the reprogrammed cells are not brand new, but the same age as the parent cell, which is advantageous for studying age-related disease. The reprogrammed cells may be better at creating age-accurate in vitro models of human disease, which are useful to study diverse degenerative diseases and accelerated aging syndromes.

“The key is to understand development of disease at a cellular level and how disease affects organs,” Ichida said. “This is something you can do with stem cells, but in this case, it skips a stem cell state. That’s important because stem cells reset epigenetics and make new, young cells, but this method allows you to get adult cells of same age to better study diseases in aged individuals, which is important as the elderly suffer more diseases.”

This latest advance in regenerative medicine complements other recent technological gains, including gene editing, tissue engineering and stem cell development. It represents a convergence in regenerative medicine moving scientists closer to treating many diseases. It has practical utility to accelerate targeted medical treatments and precision medicine.

Said Ichida: “A modern approach for disease studies and regenerative medicine is to induce cells to switch their identity. This is called reprogramming, and it enables the attainment of inaccessible tissue types from diseased patients for examination, as well as the potential restoration of lost tissue. However, reprogramming is extremely inefficient, limiting its utility. In this study, we’ve identified the roadblock that prevents cells from switching their identity. It turns out to be tangles on the DNA within cells that form during the reprogramming process. By activating enzymes that untangle the DNA, we enable near 100% reprogramming efficiency.”

The study authors include Ichida and first authors Kimberley Babos and Kate Galloway (the latter is now an assistant professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology), as well as Kassandra Kisler, Madison Zitting, Yichen Li, Yingxiao Shi, Brooke Quintino, Robert Chow and Berislav Zlokovic of the Keck School of Medicine.

Funding for the study comes from a California Institute for Regenerative Medicine predoctoral training grant (TG2-01161); a Kirschstein-National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellowship (5F32NS092417-03); National Institutes of Health grants (R00NS077435, R01NS097850 and 5R01DC0155300); U.S. Department of Defense grant (W81XWH-15-1-0187); grants from the Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation, the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation and the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, the Harrington Discovery Institute, the Tau Consortium, the Pape Adams Foundation, the Frick Foundation for ALS Research, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the John Douglas French Alzheimer’s Foundation, the Merkin Family Foundation, the New York Stem Cell Foundation, the Keck School of Medicine, the USC Broad Innovation Award and the Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

Ichida is a co-founder and owner of AcuraStem, a California-based precision medicine company.  USC also has a financial interest in Acurastem. Other authors declare no competing interests.

Mentioned in this article: Justin Ichida, PhD, Robert H. Chow, MD, PhD